Nick Henchie (26 August) states: β€œIt is possible that more use will be made of jointly appointed experts, which could not only save time and costs but will probably lead to earlier settlement of cases.” This is most interesting.

In response to Alan Danieli’s difficulties in getting clients to pay up, reported in ΠΤ°Ι΅ηΜ¨ earlier this year, Tony Bingham (13 May) proposed the concept of an β€œarbitral investigator”. Well, for β€œexpert” in Nick’s article, read β€œlegal expert” and we are nearly there.

Mr Danieli, could you have started a crusade?

It is clear from many articles that the current system is fundamentally flawed and the word β€œjustice” is a misnomer.

Postscript

Arthur Gilbert, Network Rail

Topics